You’ve found the home you love. But what happens if you haven’t sold the one you’re living in? Here’s what North Shore homeowners need to know about buying first, selling first, and making an offer subject to the sale of your home.

There’s a question I hear from homeowners who are thinking about making a move, and it’s a bit of a chicken-and-egg situation.

Do you sell your home first and then find somewhere to go? Or do you find the home you love and hope everything falls into place on the selling side?

A few years ago, this decision was a whole lot easier.

During the strong seller’s market we experienced for several years, I could almost promise my clients that, with the right pricing and preparation, we would have their detached home sold within ten days. Buyers were competing for limited inventory, homes were moving quickly, and coordinating a sale with a purchase was often much more straightforward.

But markets change. And right now, the equation looks quite different.

First, let's talk about the market we're in

In a buyer's market, like we are in today, there are generally more homes available relative to the number of buyers. Buyers have more choice, sellers face more competition, and selling a home can take longer than it did during those busy market years.

What matters most when planning your move is understanding that you may not be able to predict exactly when your home will sell or precisely what a buyer will be willing to pay.

And that uncertainty is what makes the buy-first-or-sell-first decision so important.

Option 1: Sell your home first

This is often the more financially conservative approach.

You put your home on the market, negotiate a sale, and establish how much money you have to work with before committing to your next property.

The biggest advantage? Certainty.

You know your sale price, your closing date and, broadly speaking, your available equity. That gives you a much clearer budget when shopping for your next home.

You can make an offer without needing to sell another property first, which can put you in a stronger negotiating position. Sellers may be more receptive to an offer with fewer conditions, and you can often be more flexible about closing dates.

There is a trade-off, though.

What happens if your home sells before you find the right place to go?

You might need temporary accommodation, somewhere to store your belongings, or a plan for a short-term rental. You may have to move twice, which adds cost and inconvenience.

And there is another challenge: once your home is sold, you may feel pressure to find your next property before your closing date.

For some people, that works perfectly. For others, especially those who have lived in the same home for decades, the thought of selling before knowing where they are going can feel unsettling.

This is where planning your next chapter before putting your home on the market becomes so important.

Option 2: Buy your next home first

Let's say you've found the perfect condo, townhouse or smaller home. It checks all the boxes, and you can genuinely picture yourself living there.

You don't want to lose it while waiting for your current home to sell.

So, you buy first.

The obvious advantage is that you know where you're going. You can focus on preparing your existing home for sale without worrying about finding somewhere to live at the same time.

But there is a significant financial consideration.

You are committing to the purchase before knowing exactly when your current home will sell or how much you will receive for it.

If you have sufficient savings, accessible equity, bridge financing or other financial resources, buying first may be a reasonable strategy. You still need to understand the costs and risks of carrying two properties, potentially including two mortgages, property taxes, insurance and maintenance.

But if your next purchase depends on the proceeds from your existing home, buying first can be a much bigger gamble.

What if your home takes three months to sell? What if the offers come in lower than you expected? What if you need to reduce your asking price to attract a buyer?

You may find yourself in a position where you have committed to a purchase at one price but are receiving less than anticipated for your sale.

That gap has to be funded somehow.

Buying first can work beautifully when the finances are in place and the risks are understood. It becomes much more stressful when the plan relies on everything going exactly as expected.

Option 3: Find the home you love and make an offer subject to the sale of your property

This is where the chicken-and-egg dilemma gets interesting.

A subject-to-sale offer is a conditional offer to purchase a property that gives the buyer a specified period to sell their existing home. The exact wording matters, and the condition needs to be carefully drafted to reflect the buyer's circumstances.

Essentially, you are telling the seller:

I want to buy your home, but I need to sell mine first.

It can be an attractive solution because you can secure a property you love without immediately committing to an unconditional purchase.

However, there are some important caveats.

First, the seller has to agree

This is a point worth understanding before you start house hunting with the expectation that a subject-to-sale offer will be an option.

A seller is under no obligation to accept an offer subject to the sale of your home.

In today's market, we are sometimes seeing a domino effect of subject-to-sale transactions. One homeowner wants to buy a property, but their purchase depends on selling their own home. The seller of that property may also be buying somewhere else, and their purchase may depend on selling their home, too.

You can see how quickly the timing becomes complicated.

If the seller needs the certainty of an unconditional sale, or needs their own sale proceeds to complete their next purchase, they may simply not be in a position to accept your offer.

Even if your offer is attractive in other respects, your condition introduces another layer of uncertainty into an already complicated chain of transactions.

This doesn't mean subject-to-sale offers are off the table. It means you need to understand the seller's circumstances, the timing involved and whether your offer can realistically work for everyone.

And even if a seller is willing to consider your offer, the terms, price and deadlines will matter.

The pros

1. You know where you're going.

You have found a property that suits your needs and made an offer. If the conditions are satisfied and the transaction proceeds, you have a clear destination for your next chapter.

For someone downsizing, this can be especially helpful. You can start thinking about furniture, floor plans, storage and how you want to live in your new space.

2. You have time to sell your current home.

Rather than committing to a purchase that depends on a future sale, your offer can provide a defined period in which to sell your existing property.

That said, the time frame needs to be realistic. If you need more time, an extension may be possible, but the seller is not necessarily obligated to agree.

The cons

1. Your offer may be less attractive to the seller.

Put yourself in the seller's shoes.

They have a home to sell, and along comes a buyer who wants to purchase it, provided they can sell another property first.

Compare that with a buyer who is financially ready, has fewer conditions and can offer a closing date that works for the seller.

Which offer would you prefer?

A subject-to-sale offer introduces uncertainty for the seller. They may need to wait while your home is marketed, shown and negotiated, without knowing whether the transaction will ultimately proceed.

As a result, you may have less negotiating power on price or other terms. The seller may simply choose a competing offer with fewer conditions.

That doesn't mean subject-to-sale offers are impossible. It means the terms, price and circumstances need to make sense for everyone involved.

2. You have a deadline to sell your home.

Your purchase agreement will specify a period for satisfying the sale condition.

That deadline can create pressure, particularly in a slower market. If your home isn't selling as quickly as expected, you may have to consider a price adjustment, negotiate an extension or decide whether you can proceed without the sale.

This is why pricing your home realistically from the beginning and understanding your financial limits are so important.

3. You may not get the price you were expecting.

This is one of the biggest risks I see in the current market.

You may have an idea of what your home is worth based on past sales, previous market conditions or what a neighbour received a few years ago. But the market today may tell a different story.

If you have already negotiated the purchase of your next property, receiving less than expected for your current home can leave you with a financial gap.

You can certainly explore renegotiating your purchase, but the seller is not required to reduce the price simply because your sale proceeds were lower than anticipated.

Before making an offer, you need to know what happens if your home sells for less than you hoped.

The 72-hour clause: the detail you really need to understand

This is where things can become particularly stressful.

A subject-to-sale agreement may include what is commonly called a 72-hour clause, although the actual time period and wording can vary.

Here's how it generally works.

You've made an offer on a home, subject to selling your existing property. The seller accepts your offer, and you begin preparing your home for sale.

Then another buyer comes along and makes an offer that the seller wants to accept.

If the agreement contains an applicable time clause, the seller may be able to require you to act within the specified period. Depending on the wording, you may need to remove your sale condition or otherwise decide whether to proceed, even if your own home hasn't sold.

If you cannot or choose not to proceed on the required terms, the agreement may allow the seller to terminate the contract in accordance with the clause.

Imagine what that could look like.

You've spent weeks decluttering, arranging repairs, preparing your home for photographs, hosting showings and keeping everything looking presentable. You've mentally moved into your next home, perhaps even started planning where the sofa will go.

Then you receive notice that another buyer has made an offer.

Suddenly, you have a very short window to decide whether you can proceed with your purchase without having sold your current home.

That is not a decision you want to make under pressure without having considered the financial implications beforehand.

A 72-hour clause does not automatically mean you have 72 hours to sell your home. It generally concerns your response to the seller's competing offer, according to the specific contract wording. The details matter, so make sure you understand the condition before signing.

And remember, a subject-to-sale offer doesn't guarantee that you'll get to purchase the property. You need to be comfortable with that possibility before committing to the process.

Are you ready to list tomorrow?

Here's something I encourage my clients to think about long before they start house hunting.

If the perfect property came on the market tomorrow, would you be ready to put your home up for sale?

It's an important question, particularly if you're planning to make an offer subject to the sale of your existing home.

If your offer is accepted, you need to be in a position to get your home on the market as quickly as possible. You can't necessarily spend the next three months sorting through the garage, deciding what to do with the spare bedroom or finally getting around to painting the kitchen.

The clock may already be ticking.

I see this with downsizers who have been talking about moving for years. They've thought about the condo, imagined the lock-and-leave lifestyle, and perhaps even spent a few weekends browsing listings. But the house itself? That's another story.

The same applies to growing families who have outgrown their current home and are waiting for that elusive property with the extra bedroom, bigger yard or perfect neighbourhood.

It's easy to wait until you find the right property before preparing your current home for sale. But in today's market, that approach can put you on the back foot.

Start preparing before you're ready to move

You don't need to put your home on the market tomorrow. But if a move is somewhere on your horizon, there are things you can do now to make the eventual transition much easier.

• Start decluttering. You don't need to tackle the entire house in one weekend. Start with a closet, the spare room or those boxes that haven't been opened since your last move. If you're downsizing, remember that everything you don't need to take with you is one less thing to deal with later.

• Address the small repairs. Fix the loose handles, touch up the paint, replace tired light fixtures or attend to the little maintenance jobs you've been putting off. Small improvements can make a difference to how your home presents, and getting them done ahead of time gives you more flexibility.

• Think strategically about renovations. Not every home needs a renovation before selling. In fact, some projects won't deliver enough return to justify the cost. But if your kitchen, bathrooms or flooring are looking dated, it's worth discussing your options before you're working against a deadline.

• Get a realistic picture of your home's value. Understanding what your property might sell for, how it compares with competing listings and what buyers are looking for helps you make informed decisions about your next purchase.

• Have a plan for the practical details. Who will help with decluttering? What needs to be repaired? Will you need staging, professional cleaning or help coordinating contractors? Knowing who to call can save valuable time when an opportunity arises.

You don't have to do everything at once

This isn't about creating pressure to move before you're ready. It's about giving yourself options.

If you're thinking about downsizing in the next year or two, starting early means you can make decisions thoughtfully rather than rushing through them under the pressure of an accepted offer.

And if you're looking to upsize, the same principle applies. Getting your existing home ready before you find the next one means you can act more confidently when the right property appears.

The goal is to be prepared enough that when the right opportunity comes along, you can focus on the decision itself, rather than scrambling to get your life and your house ready for sale.

Because finding the right property is only half the equation. Being ready to make the move is the other half.

So, what's the best strategy in today's market?

The honest answer is that it depends on your circumstances.

There isn't a single right approach for everyone, and I wouldn't recommend one without first understanding your financial position, your timeline and what you are hoping to achieve with your move.

Here are a few questions I would want to work through with you before making that decision:

• How much financial flexibility do you have? Could you carry two properties temporarily if necessary, or do you need the proceeds from your current home to complete your purchase?

• How quickly does your current home need to sell? A property that is priced appropriately and compares favourably with competing listings may have a very different outlook from one that needs significant preparation or is competing with many similar listings.

• How specific are your needs for the next home? If you're looking for something very particular, selling first may mean having to wait for the right property to come along.

• How comfortable are you with uncertainty? Some people are happy to manage temporary accommodation or carry additional costs. Others value the security of knowing their sale is complete before moving forward.

• What happens if things don't go according to plan? This is perhaps the most important question of all. You need a Plan B before you need one.

The goal isn't simply to buy or sell in the right order. It's to create a strategy that works for your finances, your lifestyle and your peace of mind.

My advice? Start with the plan, not the property.

When someone tells me they're thinking about downsizing or moving to their next home, I don't believe the first question should be, "When do you want to list?"

I'd rather start by understanding what they want their next chapter to look like.

Where do they want to live? What kind of home will suit them? What do they need financially from the sale? What needs to happen before their current home is ready for the market? And what would make the transition feel manageable rather than overwhelming?

Once we understand those pieces, we can work backwards and decide whether selling first, buying first or exploring a subject-to-sale offer makes the most sense.

Sometimes the best strategy is to sell first and shop with confidence. Sometimes buying first is entirely achievable. And sometimes a subject-to-sale offer is worth exploring, provided the terms and risks are understood.

But preparation isn't just about getting the house ready to sell. It's about getting your whole moving plan ready.

That means understanding your finances, having a realistic view of what your home may sell for, preparing your property, knowing your options for the next home and having a practical plan for timing. It also means considering what you'll do if your home sells for less than expected, takes longer to sell or the property you've set your heart on doesn't work out.

You want to make decisions based on a realistic plan, not on the assumption that everything will fall into place.

There are pros and cons to all three approaches, but one thing is certain: you don't want to be making these decisions for the first time when you're standing in the middle of a negotiation.

A little preparation now can make an enormous difference later.

If you're considering a move on the North Shore, after reading this article your head is spinning, and you aren't sure how to coordinate the sale of your current home with the purchase of your next one, I'm always happy to help you explore your options.

As The Downsizing Specialist, my approach is about helping you connect all the pieces, from figuring out where you want to go to planning how to get there.

Because moving isn't just about selling one property and buying another. It's about making sure the transition works for you.

And ideally, without the chicken-and-egg headache along the way.

Shelley Hird is a North Shore Realtor® and The Downsizing Specialist, helping homeowners navigate the practical and personal decisions involved in moving to their next chapter.

For many North Shore homeowners, decades of real estate appreciation have created extraordinary wealth. But when that wealth is tied up in the family home, what does it mean for retirement?

There is a particular kind of wealth that has become increasingly familiar on Vancouver's North Shore.

It belongs to the couple who bought their detached home decades ago, raised their children there and gradually paid down the mortgage. Over the years, the neighbourhood changed, property values climbed and the family home became worth considerably more than they ever imagined.

Today, their house might be worth $2.2 million.

They may have substantial equity, a paid-off mortgage or very little debt. By conventional measures, they are wealthy.

Yet their day-to-day retirement income may still come primarily from pensions, government benefits, registered retirement savings and other investments.

Their wealth is visible from the street. Their financial flexibility is a different question.

A nation of homeowners with significant wealth tied to property

Housing has long played an important role in building Canadian household wealth.

According to Statistics Canada's 2023 data, principal residences represented 38% of the total value of Canadian assets. The same year's Survey of Financial Security found that Canadian families whose main income earner was 65 or older had a median net worth of $1,109,700.

In British Columbia, median family net worth was $773,500, compared with $519,700 nationally.

These figures help establish the financial importance of property ownership, but they don't tell the whole story. Net worth includes more than home equity, and the proportion of wealth held in real estate varies considerably between households.

Still, the national picture raises an important question: how does a lifetime of housing wealth translate into financial security during retirement?

On the North Shore, this question has a distinctly local dimension.

Two decades of appreciation have changed the equation

Greater Vancouver REALTORS’ MLS Home Price Index recorded a North Vancouver detached-home benchmark of $753,600 in May 2006. By January 2026, that benchmark had reached $2,037,600, an approximate nominal increase of 170%.

This comparison illustrates the scale of long-term price appreciation in the local market.

For homeowners who purchased decades ago, however, years of mortgage repayment and rising property values may have created substantial equity.

Consider a hypothetical household whose detached home is now worth $2.2 million, with $200,000 remaining on the mortgage.

Their home equity is approximately $2 million.

That is an extraordinary asset. But it is not the same as having $2 million in an investment account.

The home does not automatically provide monthly income, pay for a new roof or cover an unexpected expense. To access that wealth, the homeowner needs to make a deliberate decision about whether to sell, borrow against the property or pursue another financial strategy.

This is where the distinction between being wealthy and having financial flexibility becomes important.

When your biggest asset doesn't pay the bills

Some homeowners have ample pensions and investments and have no need to touch their home equity. For them, staying may be the obvious choice.

Others may be managing their spending carefully, postponing travel or worrying about future maintenance costs despite holding considerable wealth in their property.

Two households with equally valuable homes can have very different retirement experiences. One may have a substantial investment portfolio and a reliable pension. The other may depend largely on government benefits, modest retirement savings and the equity in the family home.

The question is not simply how much a house is worth. It is how that wealth fits into the owner's overall financial circumstances.

A home can provide stability, security and a valuable financial reserve. But if a large proportion of a household's wealth is concentrated in property, it can also limit the amount of capital readily available for other purposes.

The hidden cost of staying in the family home

A detached home is more than a mortgage payment.

There are property taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs, exterior maintenance, landscaping and the inevitable larger expenses that arrive with an aging property. There is also the time and energy required to keep everything running.

For some retirees, maintaining a large home and garden remains a pleasure. For others, it gradually becomes an obligation.

Rooms that once accommodated a growing family may rarely be used. Stairs may become less convenient. The roof, windows or exterior may need substantial investment. Managing contractors and routine maintenance can become more tiring than it once was.

None of this means that a large home is inherently inappropriate for retirement. It simply means that the full cost of staying includes more than the value of the property.

It includes the money spent maintaining it, the time devoted to it and the freedom it may or may not provide.

Property taxes: a change worth understanding

There is another practical consideration for some retirees: property tax deferment.

In British Columbia, eligible homeowners aged 55 and older can apply to defer their annual property taxes through a provincial loan program. For years, this has provided a way for homeowners to remain in their homes while preserving their monthly cash flow.

However, the program's economics have changed significantly in 2026.

Under the previous rules, the interest rate for the regular deferment program was set at prime minus two percentage points, with simple interest. For new deferrals in 2026 and subsequent years, the rate has changed to prime plus two percentage points, with interest compounded monthly.

As of October 1, 2026, the rate is 6.45% annually, compared with the previous rate of 2.45% for amounts deferred under the earlier terms. That's an increase of four percentage points, or more than double the previous rate. The rate is subject to quarterly changes.

This doesn't mean property tax deferment is no longer worthwhile. For some homeowners, preserving cash flow may still be more important than the interest cost, and the program may remain a useful option. But it does mean the decision deserves a fresh look rather than being treated as an automatic annual choice.

In my work with retirees on the North Shore, property tax deferment is one of the practical strategies that comes up in conversations about staying in the family home. With the new interest terms, it is increasingly important for homeowners to understand what their deferred balance may cost over time and to compare that with their other financial options.

For someone sitting on substantial home equity but relying on a relatively modest retirement income, this brings us back to the bigger question: is the home still supporting the retirement they want, or are they increasingly relying on borrowing against an asset simply to maintain their current lifestyle?

The opportunity cost of doing nothing

What might become possible if a homeowner chose to access some of their equity?

Selling a large detached home and purchasing a less expensive property could potentially release capital, reduce maintenance responsibilities and simplify everyday life.

For one person, that might mean travelling more. For another, it could mean having money available for unexpected expenses, helping family members or simply feeling more comfortable about the years ahead.

The financial outcome depends on the details. Selling costs, moving expenses, property taxes where applicable, the cost of the replacement home, strata fees, investment considerations and individual tax circumstances all need to be assessed.

Moving to a condominium, for example, may reduce some maintenance responsibilities while introducing strata fees and other costs. A smaller property is not automatically less expensive in every respect.

There may also be ways to improve financial flexibility without selling, depending on the homeowner's circumstances and willingness to consider alternatives.

The point is not that moving is always the better financial decision. It is that the decision deserves to be explored rather than made by default.

Why moving is rarely just a financial decision

If the financial argument for moving were the only consideration, more people might make the change.

But homes are not ordinary assets.

They hold decades of memories, familiar routines and a sense of belonging. They represent the place where children grew up, family celebrations happened and neighbours became friends.

Leaving can feel like losing a part of one's identity. There may also be understandable concerns about finding a suitable replacement, giving up a garden, dealing with strata rules or moving into a market where smaller properties are still expensive.

For many homeowners, staying is a deeply considered choice. For others, the idea of moving feels so overwhelming that they postpone exploring it altogether.

These are very different situations, and they deserve to be treated that way.

A question worth asking before circumstances make the decision

Perhaps the most useful time to consider a move is not when a health concern, an expensive repair or a change in circumstances makes it urgent.

It is when there is still time to explore the options.

That might mean comparing the true cost of staying with the cost of a different property, speaking with a financial planner, considering accessibility or simply asking what the next 10 or 15 years should look like.

For some people, the conclusion will be to stay exactly where they are.

For others, it may be that a different home could release capital, reduce responsibilities and create more room for the experiences they have spent decades working towards.

Neither decision is universally right.

But there is value in making it consciously, with a clear understanding of the financial and lifestyle implications.

For North Shore homeowners who have accumulated significant equity over many years, the question may no longer be simply, "What is my home worth?"

It may be, "What do I want this wealth to make possible?"

Because a home can be a wonderful place to live, a valuable financial asset and an important part of a family's story.

The opportunity is to make sure it continues to support the life its owners want to lead.

Shelley Hird
Downsizing Specialist and North Shore REALTOR®
www.thedownsizingspecialist.com

• Statistics Canada — Survey of Financial Security, 2023: Read the release. The source for median net worth by age and household characteristics.

• Statistics Canada — The assets, debts and net worth of Canadian families, 2023: Read the statistical summary. The source for the Canadian and British Columbia median net-worth figures.

• Greater Vancouver REALTORS — MLS HPI Home Price Comparison: Explore historical benchmark prices. The source for the May 2006 North Vancouver detached benchmark.

• Greater Vancouver REALTORS — North Vancouver market report: View the January 2026 report. The source for the January 2026 benchmark price.

What if we stopped thinking about retirement as something that lasts 25 or 30 years…
…and started thinking about it as a series of different chapters?

Because the reality is, 60 and 80 are not the same.
And that matters when we're deciding what to do with our homes, our money, our time and our plans for the future.

The 12-Year Window

I recently started thinking about what has been called the 12-Year Retirement Window.
Not because there is a magical statistical cutoff at age 72.

There isn't.

But retirement research consistently points to a pattern often described as the “go-go, slow-go and no-go” years.
The early years of retirement tend to be the most active.
This is when people are more likely to travel, pursue hobbies, visit family, take longer trips, renovate, explore new interests and finally do some of the things they've been putting off while working.

As the years progress, activity and spending tend to decline.
Not necessarily because people stop wanting to do things.
Sometimes, it's because their health, energy, mobility or circumstances change.

Statistics Canada data illustrates the broader reality of aging. In 2023, 49.3% of Canadians aged 50–64 reported their health as very good or excellent. Among Canadians 65 and older, that figure was 40.5%.

Of course, plenty of 75-year-olds are travelling the world, skiing, hiking and living incredibly active lives.
And plenty of 62-year-olds aren't.

Age is not a deadline.

But it is a variable worth planning around.
And that's why I think the first decade or so of retirement deserves more attention.

What if you planned around your healthiest years?

Think about the things you say you want to do someday.
Travel more.
Spend winters somewhere warm.
Take the big trip.
Visit your kids wherever they are.
Spend more time with your grandchildren.
Learn to sail.
Play golf.
Cycle through Europe.
Buy a little place somewhere you love.
Take three months and just live somewhere different.
Spend more time with your partner.
Maybe simply wake up on a Tuesday morning and think:
“What do we feel like doing today?”

These are the things retirement is supposed to give us time for.
But here's the catch.

Having the money isn't enough.

You need the health.
You need the energy.
You need the freedom.
And you need the time.

Your house can either support that freedom or compete with it

This is where I think downsizing enters the conversation in a very different way.
For many people, their home is their largest asset.
And for good reason, they don't want to give it up.
They've spent decades building equity.

But sometimes we spend so much time protecting the house that we forget to ask what the house is supposed to be doing for us.

A large family home can require a tremendous amount of time and money.
There is maintenance.
There are repairs.
There is landscaping.
There are property taxes.
There are utilities.
There are renovations.
There is cleaning.
And there is simply the mental load of having a large property to look after.

Maybe that's exactly what you want.
But what if it isn't?

What if selling that home at 58, 60 or 62 could release significant equity and reduce your ongoing expenses?

What if moving into something smaller and easier to maintain meant you could retire a little earlier?

What if the money you weren't spending on the house could instead fund the things you've been dreaming about?

And what if the time you weren't spending maintaining the house could be spent living?

There is something else we don't talk about enough

Who are you planning to enjoy those years with?

Because if you're part of a couple, retirement isn't just about your individual health.
It's about the two of you.
Maybe your dream is to travel together.
Maybe you've spent 30 years working toward the same goal.
Maybe you've imagined finally having time to sit on a patio somewhere in Italy for three weeks.
Or spending winters in Hawaii.
Or taking off in an RV.
Or simply having more ordinary days together without a work schedule dictating your lives.

And here's the uncomfortable truth:
There is no guarantee that both people will remain healthy at the same time.

We all know this.
We've seen it happen to our parents.
We've watched friends face unexpected diagnoses.
We've seen someone suddenly become a caregiver.
We've seen plans change.

Yet somehow, when we're planning our own retirement, we often behave as though we'll both be perfectly healthy at 78, 82 and 85.

Maybe we will.
But maybe we won't.
And that's not a reason to be fearful.
It's a reason to be intentional.

Don't wait for retirement to start living

One of the biggest mistakes I see people make is thinking:
“We'll do that when we retire.”
We'll travel when we retire.
We'll spend more time together when we retire.
We'll renovate when we retire.
We'll simplify when we retire.
We'll finally enjoy the house when we retire.

But retirement itself isn't a guarantee of good health, unlimited energy or endless time.
The years immediately after leaving work may actually be some of the most valuable years you have.

That's why I think it's worth asking:

What would you do if you knew you had 12 really active years ahead of you?

Where would you go?
Who would you spend them with?
What would you learn?
What would you stop doing?
What would you finally say yes to?

And perhaps most importantly:
What would you need to change today to make those years possible?

Maybe downsizing isn't about giving something up

Maybe it's about getting something back.
Less house.
More time.
Less maintenance.
More travel.
Less stuff.
More freedom.
Less responsibility.
More experiences.

Less money tied up in a home you no longer need.
More money available to create the life you've been working toward.

That doesn't mean everyone should sell their home at 60.
It doesn't mean a condo is automatically a better financial investment.
And it certainly doesn't mean that life suddenly changes at 72.
What it means is that your home should support the life you want to live, not simply the life you've already lived.

So, what is your 12-year plan?

Maybe you're 55 and retirement is still several years away.
Maybe you're 61 and you're already thinking about the next chapter.
Or maybe you're 68 and realizing that there are still things on your list you really want to do.

The question isn't:
“How long can I stay in this house?”

Perhaps the better question is:
“How do I want to spend the healthiest, most active years of my retirement?”

And then work backwards.
What will that cost?
Where do you want to live?
How much freedom do you want?
How much home do you actually need?
And what changes could you make now to give yourself the best chance of enjoying those years?

Because your home is an investment.
Your retirement is an investment too.
And time may be the most valuable investment of all.

Shelley Hird
Downsizing Specialist and North Shore REALTOR®
www.thedownsizingspecialist.com